Case 03 · Hiring Disaster

“We hired three associates. None lasted six months.”

Bengaluru PE/VC boutique · 9 lawyers · 4 years

6–9 moMonths of revenue-equivalent leakage per hire failure
03 / 08Composite Indian law-firm case

What broke

The firm was scaling. Three associates were hired through a recruiter at a premium fee. Within six months: one resigned for an LLM in the UK, one moved to an in-house role at a portfolio company of one of the firm's clients (awkward), one was let go because the work expected of them was never what was actually scoped. The partners blamed the recruiter; the recruiter blamed the partners' role briefs.

Why it broke

There was no documented role profile, no structured interview process, no skills assessment, no expectations memo, no onboarding plan beyond "we'll figure it out". Indian law firm attrition is rising — Vahura forecasts continued lateral movement to international firms and in-house roles — but unstructured hiring multiplies the problem. Replacement cost in international benchmarks is USD 200k–1M+ per associate.

How CTD would have caught this

  • Role profile written before sourcing — skills, success criteria, 90-day plan
  • Structured interview framework with calibrated scorecards across partners
  • Reference checks, conflict checks, technical assessment built into the process
  • 30/60/90-day onboarding plan with named partner mentor and clear ramp
  • Compensation benchmarked to Vahura tier data — not negotiated reactively
  • Exit interview protocol when departures do happen
Tags:
HRHiringRetention
Chat with Muskan